Final weekend, The Gateway Pundit reported on a discrepancy that was reported in a single precinct in Dallas County, Tx and later found in quite a few different precincts.  LeadStories determined to “truth examine” that story, to which we responded.  In our response stuffed with first-hand witness testimony contradicting their claims, they deferred to fact-checking the certification dates on their system.

In that regard, we are able to solely go by what the Texas Secretary of State has listed on their website regarding certifications, which ought to be up to date with every new certification for every election, however has not been since 2020.  Sounds acquainted.  ES&S responded this morning to our request for paperwork by merely telling us the certification date of Could 31, 2022.  We’ve got since requested the precise certification and accompanying paperwork.

Advertisement

LeadStories didn’t deal with witness testimony that their ballot pads, ballot books (at the very least they obtained one thing proper) had been including voters on the finish of the evening and didn’t steadiness with the handwritten ledgers, opposite to claims made on the Dallas County authorities web site.

Now we now have knowledge that evidences extra points with ballot books, this time in Virginia.  The EPEC and digitalpollwatchers.org has found by way of knowledge obtained by way of the Secretary of State that as much as 23% of in-person early voters had been checked in at unattainable occasions.  This effected upwards of 156,576 potential votes out of 520,549.

TRENDING: TGP EXCLUSIVE: 11 FACTS on the Dozens of Federal Operatives Who Infiltrated the Trump Crowds on January 6th at the US Capitol

In accordance with digitalpollwatchers.org:

In trying over the VA DAL knowledge, one attention-grabbing problem that’s readily obvious, is that the BALLOT_RECIEPT_DATE discipline for in-person, on-machine early vote knowledge is logically unattainable.

These time-stamps are speculated to be generated by the digital poll-books when a voter is checked in at an in-person early voting website. The enchantment and rationale for using digital poll-books is strictly as a result of the can automate the recording of check-in and (theoretically) reduce human error. The working hours of VA in-person early voting websites are restricted to 7am – 7pm. I’m not conscious of any in-person early voting heart that had prolonged hours previous these. Due to this fact, logically, we might anticipate that the digital ballot e-book generated time stamps for check-ins for in-person on-machine early votes would fall inside the 7am – 7pm bounds.

There have been 520,549 information that fall inside the anticipated time bounds, and 156,576 that fall outdoors of the bounds. From a purely methods perspective, that signifies that the power of our digital ballot books (or the backend database they’re tied to) to precisely report the check-in time of Early In-Particular person On-Machine voters has an error charge of 156576 / (156576+520549) = 23.12%

They went on to regulate the parameters for the ballot locations, giving them the good thing about the doubt that they opened and closed 2 hours early and late, respectively.   It did little to vary the outcomes.

What could also be much more surprising is the error charge they found for the 2020 knowledge:

If we run the identical evaluation utilizing the 7am – 7pm bounds on the 2021 and 2020 knowledge we get 29.64% and 71.17% error charges, respectively.

Within the identify of full transparency, the EPEC has made the info out there for anybody to obtain here.  The article does go on to clarify a attainable cause for the discrepancy, nevertheless, the reason would warrant additional questions in regards to the reliability of digital pollbooks within the first place:

The inclusion of the latter class of error computation is with a view to account for the distant likelihood {that a} locality is legitimately utilizing paper ballot books or in any other case not recording the time of the voter examine in, however solely recording the date info (which might be according to all timestamps at midnight). VA requires the usage of digital ballot books, however there are nonetheless some that use handbook entry paper poll-books as backup. So even IF that was the reason for why so many entries had been uniformly timestamped to midnight … (A) why did they must go to their paper ballot e-book backups within the first place? and (B) we nonetheless have a residual error of 0.05% throughout the state that must be defined even after eradicating uniform midnight timestamps from consideration. That may not appear a very enormous error charge at first blush, however when you think about that the majority digital knowledge recording methods (at the very least that I’m conscious of) have error charge requirement thresholds for acceptance testing set to the order of 1/1,000,000 … thats nonetheless unacceptable. I’ve been unable to discover a documented requirement for error charge threshold for the digital ballot e-book methods utilized in VA, as per the VA division of elections.





Source link

AdvertisementBuild your website with Namecheap!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here